![]() The limitation benefits large advertisers, including Google, and puts smaller advertisers at a disadvantage.įLoC, Privacy Sandbox, and the Topics API do not improve privacy rather, they’re proposals to make the least private browser slightly less bad. Topics limits the exposure of a user's interests to sites visited in the past, and the advertisers that were loaded on those sites. ![]() In particular, it is still Google that is deciding what is sensitive and as such excluded from being used for advertising purposes. Update: Brave published a statement on its site stating that Topics does not address all of the company's points of criticism. Other objections included letting Google determine what it considered sensitive information, which the company wanted to exclude from being used for advertising purposes, and informing any site about interests, even if sites were never visited in the past. ![]() Companies like DuckDuckGo, Brave or Vivaldi rejected FLoC for a number of reasons, including that cohort information could become a strong fingerprinting identifier, as cohorts consisted of a few thousand users.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |